Friday, July 31, 2009
New feature: songs blasting by outside my window #1
An ideal feature for a nursing mom, and short enough for one-handed typing. Even if today's track is a little less than remarkable: Blue Rodeo's "Till I Am Myself Again".
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Bookish books in the post
I think that both of these books are going to prove delightful in their own particular ways.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Two months
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Where We Have to Go
I've just finished reading Where We Have to Go, a novel by my former classmate Lauren Kirshner. It's the coming-of-age story of Lucy Bloom, a cat lover and an ALF lover with far too many odds against her. Featuring a truly great first line, "The night before my eleventh birthday, I dreamt I was five feet off the ground and flying through the No Frill grocery store on a royal blue Schwinn."Zoe Whittall in the Globe & Mail wrote, "Kirshner tempers any potential for melodrama with an expert eye for specific detail and the curt, cruel dialogue of teen girls hell-bent on destroying each other despite their abject loneliness. She is also adept at writing perfect pop-cultural detail: the emotional resonance of Alf, a hamster named Charlie Sheen, lite-brite pegs in Lucy's pockets, all situating the story in a particular moment in recent Toronto history."
Check out more praise and information about the book at Lauren's website. This month she's also been writer in residence at Open Book Toronto.
Going to get a quart of mik with William Blake
"Part of the Romantic sensibility, a part we inevitably share at least a little, was to grieve over the loss of this childlike clarity and its replacement by the more mundane duties and obligations of adult life. Getting and spending, we lay waste our powers; the things which we have seen, we now can see no more. It may seem that the Romantic view we are articulating sees ordinary adulthood as a loss, a falling off, only briefly stemmed by a few adult geniuses.
But that neglects the other half of the equation, the part that is our uniquely adult gift. In particular, when we take on the adult obligation of caring for children, we don't give up the Romantic project, we participate in it. We participate simply by watching children. Think of some completely ordinary, boring, everyday walk, the couple of blocks to the local 7-Eleven store. Taking that same walk with a two-year old is like going to get a quart of milk with William Blake. The mundane street becomes a sort of circus. There are gates, gates that open one way and not another and that will swing back and forth if you push them just the right way. There are small walls you can walk on, very carefully. There are sewer lids that have fascinatingly regular patterns and scraps of brightly coloured pizza-delivery flyers. There are intriguing strangers to examine carefully from behind a protective parental leg. There is a veritable zoo of creatures, from tiny pill bugs and earthworms to the enormous excitement, or terror, of a real barking dog. The trip to 7-Eleven becomes a hundred times more interesting, even though, of course, it does take ten times as long. Watching children awakens our own continuing capacities for wonder and knowledge."-- from The Scientist in the Crib, Gopnik, Meltzoff and Kuhl
But that neglects the other half of the equation, the part that is our uniquely adult gift. In particular, when we take on the adult obligation of caring for children, we don't give up the Romantic project, we participate in it. We participate simply by watching children. Think of some completely ordinary, boring, everyday walk, the couple of blocks to the local 7-Eleven store. Taking that same walk with a two-year old is like going to get a quart of milk with William Blake. The mundane street becomes a sort of circus. There are gates, gates that open one way and not another and that will swing back and forth if you push them just the right way. There are small walls you can walk on, very carefully. There are sewer lids that have fascinatingly regular patterns and scraps of brightly coloured pizza-delivery flyers. There are intriguing strangers to examine carefully from behind a protective parental leg. There is a veritable zoo of creatures, from tiny pill bugs and earthworms to the enormous excitement, or terror, of a real barking dog. The trip to 7-Eleven becomes a hundred times more interesting, even though, of course, it does take ten times as long. Watching children awakens our own continuing capacities for wonder and knowledge."-- from The Scientist in the Crib, Gopnik, Meltzoff and Kuhl
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Weird Books I've Loved
I like to say that I love books of all kinds, though that's not strictly true. There was a time, however, when it almost was, when I was little and covetted the most bizarre volumes. Books I'd snobbishly deem unworthy of capital-B Bookishness if I was consulted now. But then, oh. My library contained numerous books such as Mysteries of the Unexplained ("How ordinary men and weomen have experienced the Strange, the Uncanny and the Incredible"). I was obsessed with these books, and they always had photos of "ghosts" on staircases, and even kind of looked like ghosts if you just squint your eyes a bit (and otherwise they looked like a white glare). Also stories of children as reincarnated witches, and green children discovered living alone in the countryside.I also had a book that explained the meaning of one's dreams. I'd covetted this, hoping that the underlying theme of all my dreams would turn out to be, "You're going to have a boyfriend one day". I think my book was a Dream Dictionary, alphabetical, of course. With entries like, "Dreams of unicorns symbolize a longing for an idyllic age", or perhaps something that makes even less sense, like "Unicorn dreams mean you're worried about rain." Trouble was, I never dreamed of unicorns, or anything else that could be alphabetized. And I never really needed a dictionary to decode the fact that perpetually dreaming of being chased by outsized dogs might mean acute anxiety.
I also had a baby name book. This was long before babies were a remote possibility (though don't think I didn't go through the entire volume to figure out the perfect first and second names for each of my four (!) future children. I think that was around the time I wanted to name my kids Bianca). I really did read the whole thing multiple times, and I'm still not sure what the attraction was. How helpful was it really to know that Margaret meant "pearl"? Name meanings are about as helpful as dream analysis. But I might only think this because my name is a kind of terrier.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
On women's fiction or women in fiction, again
"Lisa Moore gets better and better," I wrote last month under "Recently Discovered" whilst reading her latest novel February. And then an esteemed acquaintance of mine emailed me asking, "When?" For he was reading February himself at that moment, and wasn't getting into it at all. "A fairly conventional historical romance" was his initial assessment, disappointingly, because he'd enjoyed Moore's previous work, and he wondered when he'd discover the brilliant bits of February that had so appealed to me.
I probably shouldn't have told you that. What I really want you all to do is go out and read February, and to love it just as much as I did. In fact, I really thought that love would come with no trouble, that my feelings towards the book were so straightforward as to be universal. "It's a rare thing," I'd written, "a perfect book", and I really thought that much was obvious. (And reviewer Caroline Adderson certainly thought so too.)
So I was surprised to find that another fine reader had found the book so unappealing. "When does the book get good?" he asked, of this book that had won me over with its very first sentence, "Helen watches as the man touches the skate blade to the sharpener." Here was a book very much in the present, very much in the physical world, and I'd never read a novel that started as such, and so I wanted to read on.
Perhaps it was lazy to just figure the differences in our opinions had to do with gender. "Maybe this is a women's book?" I suggested, and he replied a bit put-off by both my suggestion and also by a writer who would write a book that would shut male readers out. Turns out reviewer Alex Good had made an assertion similar to mine in his Toronto Star review: "This is a deeply maternal universe. Time and again, sympathy, solicitude and kindness for strangers are evoked. There are "geysers of love" and motherly feeling for vagrants, gas station attendants and of course the unborn. There is no sense of evil, aside from nature's rage in the sinking of the oil rig, and hence no conflict. The narrative doesn't progress so much as gestate, roiling around through a series of flashbacks until the hatching and matching at the end."
Exactly! Good has encapsulated what I loved about the novel exactly: the pervasive good, the ruminating narrative, the sense of gestation resulting in such a satisfying conclusion. Except, of course, he means none of this in a good way. And I wonder about this, and reviewing in general-- about how a description such as his is shorthand for "this book is bad/not literature". And about how "this book is bad/not literature" gets to be a shorthand for simply, "It didn't grab me."
Is a novel bad because it's a "women's novel" or a "man's novel"? As a woman, I don't find Hemingway bad, even with all the bullfighting. Of course, there are novels that don't fall into gendered catagories, and though universality is to be desired, I think that my very favourite novel Unless by Carol Shields (which is a maternal universe, if ever you've read one) is actually better for its specificity. I can understand how Unless might not be immediately appealing to a lot of men, but surely they could overlook that to see its literary merit.
But then, what is "literary merit", right? Someone will inevitably argue "aesthetics", but no one has ever been able to explain to me how "aesthetics" is not just a fancy way to explain away books one doesn't like. In his review, Alex Good faults February for lacking conflict and a "fast-paced, forward moving" plot. So, in essence, he faults the book for not being a different book altogether, for not being the kind of book that would appeal to him, and I'm not sure that's altogether fair.
I write this not as an attack on Alex Good's review (which was actually far more interesting than most reviews I read) but to expand upon the ideas the review prompted for me. To remark upon my surprise that February did not appeal to everyone, and to ponder what "gendered" writing is all about. Good says the gendered nature of the book is not what bothered him, but rather "that those [gendered] parts of it are so transparently the stuff of commercial fiction." But what does that mean? Rings, to me, like that common dismissal of women's writing in general being un-literary and merely the stuff of commerical fiction. (Strange that Good suggests a fast-paced, forward-moving plot would have saved the material from being commercial fiction, for isn't plot what commerical fic is made of?)
Has Lisa Moore let her readers down by writing a "women's novel"? This very question, I think, is dismissive and sexist. But irrelevant, then, if there's no such thing as a "women's novel" at all. And is it dismissive and sexist to say that there is?
I probably shouldn't have told you that. What I really want you all to do is go out and read February, and to love it just as much as I did. In fact, I really thought that love would come with no trouble, that my feelings towards the book were so straightforward as to be universal. "It's a rare thing," I'd written, "a perfect book", and I really thought that much was obvious. (And reviewer Caroline Adderson certainly thought so too.)
So I was surprised to find that another fine reader had found the book so unappealing. "When does the book get good?" he asked, of this book that had won me over with its very first sentence, "Helen watches as the man touches the skate blade to the sharpener." Here was a book very much in the present, very much in the physical world, and I'd never read a novel that started as such, and so I wanted to read on.
Perhaps it was lazy to just figure the differences in our opinions had to do with gender. "Maybe this is a women's book?" I suggested, and he replied a bit put-off by both my suggestion and also by a writer who would write a book that would shut male readers out. Turns out reviewer Alex Good had made an assertion similar to mine in his Toronto Star review: "This is a deeply maternal universe. Time and again, sympathy, solicitude and kindness for strangers are evoked. There are "geysers of love" and motherly feeling for vagrants, gas station attendants and of course the unborn. There is no sense of evil, aside from nature's rage in the sinking of the oil rig, and hence no conflict. The narrative doesn't progress so much as gestate, roiling around through a series of flashbacks until the hatching and matching at the end."
Exactly! Good has encapsulated what I loved about the novel exactly: the pervasive good, the ruminating narrative, the sense of gestation resulting in such a satisfying conclusion. Except, of course, he means none of this in a good way. And I wonder about this, and reviewing in general-- about how a description such as his is shorthand for "this book is bad/not literature". And about how "this book is bad/not literature" gets to be a shorthand for simply, "It didn't grab me."
Is a novel bad because it's a "women's novel" or a "man's novel"? As a woman, I don't find Hemingway bad, even with all the bullfighting. Of course, there are novels that don't fall into gendered catagories, and though universality is to be desired, I think that my very favourite novel Unless by Carol Shields (which is a maternal universe, if ever you've read one) is actually better for its specificity. I can understand how Unless might not be immediately appealing to a lot of men, but surely they could overlook that to see its literary merit.
But then, what is "literary merit", right? Someone will inevitably argue "aesthetics", but no one has ever been able to explain to me how "aesthetics" is not just a fancy way to explain away books one doesn't like. In his review, Alex Good faults February for lacking conflict and a "fast-paced, forward moving" plot. So, in essence, he faults the book for not being a different book altogether, for not being the kind of book that would appeal to him, and I'm not sure that's altogether fair.
I write this not as an attack on Alex Good's review (which was actually far more interesting than most reviews I read) but to expand upon the ideas the review prompted for me. To remark upon my surprise that February did not appeal to everyone, and to ponder what "gendered" writing is all about. Good says the gendered nature of the book is not what bothered him, but rather "that those [gendered] parts of it are so transparently the stuff of commercial fiction." But what does that mean? Rings, to me, like that common dismissal of women's writing in general being un-literary and merely the stuff of commerical fiction. (Strange that Good suggests a fast-paced, forward-moving plot would have saved the material from being commercial fiction, for isn't plot what commerical fic is made of?)
Has Lisa Moore let her readers down by writing a "women's novel"? This very question, I think, is dismissive and sexist. But irrelevant, then, if there's no such thing as a "women's novel" at all. And is it dismissive and sexist to say that there is?
Links
New (to me) blogs on the horizon! Such as The Literary Type, the official blog of The New Quarterly. TNQ is always good, and I'm sure we'll see the same quality of work online. Check out the first post, "On Joining the Conversation", about how online is where literary people are talking these days. I'm also obsessed with the blog Making It Lovely, which is sort of strange because it's about interior design, but also about design on a broader scale and its creator is brilliant. And join our Facebook group, [re]use your mug. As some of you can't help but know, our city is in the midst of a garbage strike, and trash has piled up in the streets. We've posted pictures of the mess in our gallery-- note how much of it is cups, yes? A grand opportunity (in disguise) for us to realize how much less garbage we'd produce if we cut the disposible cups out of our lives. I, for one, had taken the pledge.
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Something Amazing
And so today is a good time for me to start reading The Scientist in the Crib (as recommended by Steph at Crooked House). I am looking forward to a book about babies that does not purport to be a "guide", except perhaps one to understanding. And, of course, because man cannot subsist on non-fiction alone, I'm also reading my former classmate Lauren Kirshner's novel Where We Have to Go, which fits in well with all the rest if I regard it as a parenting anti-guide.
The best news is that I own a computer again, and so this week's project is a little life here at Pickle Me This. Though I really can't be held to anything these days at all.
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Good Text
From the Descant blog, Katie Franklin on her feminist erotic bookclub and desire for books: "In The Pleasure of the Text Roland Barthes insists, “the text is a fetish object, and the fetish desires me” (Barthes 27). As a librarian I see how the public forms relationships with their books. Patrons come in exacerbated if the paperback they’ve put on hold hasn’t come in yet: “What do you mean my book hasn’t come in? I need it now!” Such outbursts of desire, which may seem more natural in the bedroom, are often common expressions at the circulation desk of the library. However, I don’t blame them for their yearnings. Everyone is entitled to some good text."
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
A Perfectly Adjusted Organism
"Most of life is so dull that there is nothing to be said about it, and the books and talk that would describe it as interesting are obliged to exaggerate, in the hope of justifying their own existence. Inside the cocoon of work or social obligation, the human spirit slumbers for the most part, registering the distinction between pleasure and pain, but not nearly as alert as we pretend. There are periods in the most thrilling day during which nothing happens, and though we continue to exclaim, 'I do enjoy myself' or 'I am horrified' we are insincere. 'As far as I feel anything, it is enjoyment, horror'-- it's no more than that, really, and a perfectly adjusted organism would be silent."-- from E.M. Forster's A Passage to India
Monday, July 13, 2009
Bits and pieces
I am so excited to read the final volume of the Anne books-- I wasn't aware such a volume existed, and wonder if it's actually finished, as its form sounds quite fragmentary. But no less, my favourite Anne books were the last bunch (House of Dreams, Rainbow Valley, Anne of Ingleside and Rilla of Ingleside), precisely for their dealings with "serious" and "darker" themes this book supposedly contends with-- I couldn't help but think about Anne's stillborn baby in light of Montgomery's own experiences, Leslie Moore's marriage, WW1, the pied piper and Walter's death, when Anne fears Gilbert has ceased to love her, etc. Guardian blogger discusses the "dark side" of Green Gables. Bits of A.S. Byatt's The Children's Book called Rainbow Valley and Rilla of Ingleside to mind, actually, and Dovegreyreader interviews Byatt here. Speaking of interviews, Rebecca Rosenblum answers 12 or 20 questions. And speaking of nothing at all, 30 Rock ripped off the Muppet Show, why our federal tax dollars should not fund jazz, and Russell Smith on baby slings (he says do avoid the polyester).
Labels:
curiosities,
friends,
green gables,
links,
literary events,
music,
news,
television
Fiction inspired by fiction
How one book leads to another is something I've always found fascinating. I'm now reading A Passage to India, as inspired by Kate Christensen's Trouble and its Marabar Caves reference. Kate Sutherland asked about this recently (on FB, I think): fiction reading inspired by fiction reading, and she cited reading The Epic of Gilgamesh because of The Girls Who Saw Everything. I know that I watched Vertigo after reading Francine Prose's Goldengrove, but can't think of any other fiction I've read directly inspired by fiction off the top of my head. I've been meaning to get around to reading Great Expectations as inspired by Mister Pip, but as I haven't yet, I don't think it counts.
Relearning
Harriet is seven weeks tomorrow, and some semblance of regular life has returned to us. We spent our weekend doing things we would have done without her-- Saturday bbq at friends' house, Sunday brunch and ice cream. All modified somewhat, of course, by her presence (i.e. brunch at mid-afternoon), but definitely doable, and it's wonderful. It's as though since she's been born, I've had to relearn how to live in the world, because it's so different now, but we're really beginning to figure it out. Which is made very easy by Harriet's firm understanding of nighttime. She gets up once to eat, but otherwise we keep very civilized hours, and are all the better for it. She's a good baby, albeit a quite serious and/or grumpy one-- we've seen a few smiles, but they've been all too fleeting. And she only ever laughs when she's asleep, but really, I'll take any laughs at all.
Thursday, July 09, 2009
Awful Library Books
My friend K. (of the unfortunately now-defunct Pop-Triad) sent me a link to my favourite website of the day, Awful Library Books, which includes texts such as the one whose cover is seen here. The site features books that might be listed as "required weeding" from American public libraries, and I enjoy the bloggers' commentary as well ("I think the guy in a wheelchair is saying to the woman, “Do I really have to dress like Mr. Rogers?”). You're also invited to send your own submissions.
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Harriet joins the library
Yesterday, at the tender age of six weeks, Harriet became a card-carrying member of the Toronto Public Library. She slept through the ceremony, but did seem to enjoy reading Eco Babies Are Green last evening, and seemed incredibly impressed and grateful when I explained to her how lucky we are to live in a city whose fantastic library resources are available to everybody for free. She also liked the Raffi CD we borrowed (and did you know that he is Victoria College's most illustrious drop-out?).
Tuesday, July 07, 2009
The Wedding
Harriet is in the midst of her six weeks' growth spurt, which means that she's permanently attached to me, who's attached to the couch or bed most of the time, and so it goes. Luckily temporary. We're actually doing very well here, enjoying support from lactation consultants in particular! And things are not as dire as my previous post suggested-- that was early days, and week by week, life has been exponentially better. This weekend was a particularly large milestone, as we attended my best friend Jennie's wedding. It was just a modest do, with a 500+ guest list. We'd been a wee bit terrified at the prospect with such a little baby, but baby behaved better than she ever had in her whole life (and since), spending most of the weekend eating, sleeping and being adorable. With her daddy's support, I was able to pull off most of my bridesmaidly duties, and moreover had an enormous amount of fun. It was great to be away from home, to drive again, to stay in a hotel and feed baby in odd places-- makes everything else seem so much more possible. And the wedding was really a spectacular event. As I'm between computers at the mo, I can't upload my own photos, but I stole this one from my friend Britt's Facebook-- in spite of our outfits, we Bridesmaids did stand out a bit at this Sikh wedding, but really, check out the bride. She was so incredibly beautiful, gracious, and radiant, and she had her new husband absolutely belong together. I'm thrilled for them, and for me who got to be there.New computer should arrive this week or next, and I expect regularish posting will resume then.
Thursday, July 02, 2009
February by Lisa Moore
Lisa Moore's first novel Alligator was a revelation when I first read it. It was a novel composed of sentences, each one as meticulously and surprisingly crafted as the next, and I'd never read anything else like it. As a whole, however, the novel didn't completely satisfy. This might be asking too much of a book that did so many other things, but still, the project wasn't completely realized. With February, however, breathtakingly, Moore has built on her promise and in this, her second novel, she has created a brilliant literary achievement.Now, I realize that by only reading books I'll probably like, and only writing about books I do like, I may come across as a bit hyperbolic in my literary praise. Indeed, I do love an awful lot of books, but February is something different. A cut above even the very best of the rest, her is my favourite book I've read it ages. Casting its spell from the first sentence, crafted as marvelously as I'd expect, I was completely swept up in this novel that reads (as Alligator did) like nothing else I've ever read before.
February is the story of Helen, a Newfoundlander whose husband was killed in the Ocean Ranger Disaster in 1982. (Helen is fictional; the disaster is not). The story is focused in late 2008, beginning when Helen's son telephones her to inform her that a woman he'd spent a week with seven months ago is now pregnant with his child. He is calling to find out if he'll be made to do the right thing, whatever the right thing may be, and so he will by Helen's guidance, because she is a distinctly honorable woman. Which is different than being deliberately so. Much of Helen's life has been an accident, but her goodness is still palpable to the reader. Which is Moore's first great achievement-- that goodness can be interesting, worthy of a story. Moore's second achievement being her depiction of Helen and her husband's absolute, pure and total love. A portrait of a good marriage even, which is even more rare in fiction than real life. A marriage so good that there's really no getting over it, no moving on or forgetting, and Helen's loss is so heartbreakingly rendered, captured in the details and avoiding any points cliched or saccharine.
February is a novel about moving forward, about never letting go and doing the right thing. Its characters are vivid and wonderful, their thoughts positively "thought-like"-- twisting, interrupted, irrational-- as Moore's style continues on in the same surprising vein, her technical innovation perfectly realized. The story is as funny as it is sad, and that sadness has meaning beyond itself. It's a rare thing-- a perfect book. I would call it one of the best books published in Canada this year, but I'm taking my chances on it being one of the best books from anywhere.
Full Disclosure
Baby is happy right now, because I'm rocking her Fisher Price recliner with my left foot. Hence the typing with two hands here, which is enormously liberating. I pray that Harriet does not get bored of rocking soon, and until she does, let me provide you with full disclosure here. Or at least, a modicum of disclosure, as this is not the sort of blog in which I bare my soul. Rather, this is the kind of blog in which I write about my life usually through a bookish/literary perspective, and I've been doing a bit of that regarding motherhood. That Laurie Colwin quote remains the truest thing I've ever read. I remain amazed that having read thousands of books, watched TV shows and movies throughout my lifetime, I've never once seen the actual experience of having a new baby presented (and I'll be writing more about this later). Which was how I could have come into this so cluelessly, and why the reality was so overwhelming. Overwhelmingly awful. I will say that the first two weeks were the darkest I've ever known, and I feel like I've crawled out of the deepest crevice in the universe to get to where I am now. It gets better, I knew it would, but that didn't mean very much at the time. And even now, when "better" on some days is still its very own kind of hell, and nothing is what I thought it would be, and I am working harder than I've ever worked in my whole life, and normalcy seems so irretrievably far away-- at least I haven't cried since yesterday. But before that, it had been over a week, and there are moments when I'm so perfectly all right, and proud of how far we've come, and delighting in this strange little girl who has come to live with us. I have learned, however, how much I need people, and that I am so lucky to be surrounded by people on all sides. Friends, family, and oh, husbands (and mine has saved me over and over and over again). I remain a very lucky woman, and the good days are being strung together closer and closer all the time. (Baby is done rocking. Good timing.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)