Sing Them Home by Stephanie Kallos

Stephanie Kallos' novel Sing Them Home is a little bit of everything. Imagine Alice Sebold meets Wally Lamb meets Fannie Flagg, and then they all get spun up in a funnel cloud. Imagine a 500+ page novel that goes by like a breeze. This is one of those comfortable books you crawl your way into, and linger long inside, happy and warm. But then that the novel is well-written also almost seems like too much to be true.

Sing Them Home is the story of the Jones family, whose three siblings come together after their father's death-- he is killed on the golf course, struck by lightning. The family having long ago been left fragmented by their mother's disappearance, when she "went up" with a tornado and her body was never found. So that the Jones children are practically strangers to one another-- art history professor Larken lives her adamantly independent life far from her hometown of Emlyn Springs, seeking solace in eating; her brother Gaelan is a well-known weatherman and bodybuilder who seeks his solace in meaningless relationships; and Bonnie the youngest who has stayed closest to home persists in cycling up and down country roads seeking garbage she interprets as "artifacts" from the ditches.

The novel's course is the year following their father's death, during which the Jones siblings struggle to come to terms with their grief, as well as with finally reconciling with the tragedy in which they lost their mother. Emlyn Springs the backdrop for all of this, a small town in Nebraska, quirky characters populating its dying streets, but Kallos does something remarkable in making Emlyn Springs somewhere quite particular. With its Welsh heritage especially-- reflected and really outlined here in language, rituals and traditions-- as well as characters far richer than small town cliches, the town becomes actually not a backdrop at all, but is as much of a character in the story as its residents.

In similarly dealing with specifics, Kallos also makes each of her characters' individual perspectives utterly convincing. Larken's world is seen through the prism of an art lover, all colours and tones, while Gaelan's profession is fascinatingly explored, clearly an integral part of his life. Bonnie, the more whimsical of the three, is never quite as pin-down-able, always a little bit more flighty, but this is also the very point of her. Kallos' narrative switching back and forth between these characters effortlessly, encompassing also the perspective of their father's mistress, and diary entries interspersed representing the voice of their long lost mother.

So the dead speak, which means there is magic here amongst the solid realism. Some bits so utterly fantastic, bordering on sentimental, that indeed it can seem like too much to be true. The ending in particular so perfectly tidy (but perfectly satisfying!), all its ends tied, but then how could we bear any of them to be left straggling? Such tidiness not quite the way the real world works, but then thank goodness we have here a book instead.

Gluttony

I am being inundated with marvelous books: what do I see but Lauren Groff with a new one out. And I picked up Swim at the post office tonight-- it's gorgeous. Then a stop at the library, where waiting for me were My Misspent Youth: Essays by Meghan Daum, Coraline (the graphic novel), and Pool-Hopping should be in any day now. Have also just eaten a whole bag of cheese curds but shhhh.

Two fat things, and a few wonderful things

I'm now reading and thoroughly enjoying a big fat American novel, Sing Them Home by Stephanie Kallos. To be followed by The Fat Woman Next Door is Pregnant by Michel Trembley, which appears to have no paragraphs, but all the same, I'm hoping to really like it. Which will be my Canada Reads lot read. And then, that my dad is now cancer-free, my husband does not have glaucoma but that he does still have a job, and our baby is fabulous and kicking. We've booked a weekend away in early April. Also, how about this weather? It felt like springtime on this February morning...

No contradiction

"It's my audacious hope that a man born and raised between opposing dogmas, between cultures, between voices, could not help but be aware of the extreme contingency of culture. I further audaciously hope that such a man will not mistake the happy accident of his own cultural sensibilities for a set of natural laws, suitable for general application. I even hope that he will find himself in agreement with George Bernard Shaw when he declared, "Patriotism is, fundamentally, a conviction that a particular country is the best in the world because you were born in it." But that may be an audacious hope too far. We'll see if Obama's lifelong vocal flexibility will enable him to say proudly with one voice "I love my country" while saying with another voice "It is a country, like other countries." I hope so. He seems just the man to demonstrate that between those two voices there exists no contradiction and no equivocation but rather a proper and decent human harmony."-- Zadie Smith, "Speaking in Tongues"

Swim-Lit

I've been swimming five days a week for the past six months, and it's become such an important part of my life. So much though that I think I'm addicted, but then there are worse things. But I crave it, the way I can stretch into each stroke, the rhythm, the sounds the world makes under water. Though I shower afterwards, I spend the rest of the day smelling of chlorine, but I love it. Pushing off from the wall, arms sweeping the surface, even shaking the water out of my ear. There is something meditative about it, though not wholly because I certainly never spend my lengths thinking of anything very interesting or productive. But it's the quiet, the echo, feeling all the the way spent when I'm done, yet as invigorated as if I've just napped. Drying off and the water drops that remain there, each one singular, stuck fast to my skin.

Via Kate S., I was referred to Swim: A Novel by Marianne Apostolides. I've ordered it, and am looking forward to its arrival. An entire novel in lengths-- dive in metaphors are too easy, but I'm longing for immersion. I also plan to read Swimming by Nicola Keegan, which is out this summer. And if you're a publisher looking to peddle anything further in the realm of swim-lit, I'm pretty sure I'm your man.

Speaking of gorgeous books

... and speaking of gorgeous books, how about Come, Thou Tortoise by Jessica Grant, which entered my life today. And I knew as soon as I saw it, because these days a fabulous book cover design often has these two words behind it: Kelly Hill. I can't wait to start reading. The book also has me reflecting on literary tortoises, which are really quite common-- Lightning from Arcadia springs to mind from the start, because it's fresh there, and I do know that they came up in Woolf's essays, if not her fiction (which I'm not sure of). There are more, I'm sure, and one day I'll write the definitive guide.

darkness of a child's heart

"You can control and censor a child's reading, but you can't control her interpretations; no one can guess how a message that to adults seems banal or ridiculous or outmoded will alter itself and evolve inside the darkness of a child's heart."-- Hilary Mantel in The Guardian

Out in the world-- a concert and a play

Various events this winter are conspiring to keep me from becoming hermetic, and also providing me with opportunities I won't see again for a long time once The Baby is born. For example, a concert-- Dar Williams, live at the Mod Club this Saturday!! I am very excited, as I've not seen her since 2003 (live in Sheffield), being too poor for tickets when she was in Toronto in '05. And then a play! My very favourite play, no less- Arcadia, performed at Hart House Theatre in March. By Tom Stoppard-- have you read it? I've done so many times over the past ten years, and can't wait to delight in it again on stage.

Books worth it for their covers

From The Guardian Books Blog on Book Covers, I was referred to the AbeBooks promotion 30 Novels Worth Buying for the Cover Alone. Containing some picks I'd definitely concur with-- Pickle Me This faves Skim, The Monsters of Templeton, The Boys in the Trees, and Fruit. And so inspiring me to showcase the most gorgeous book I've read in ages (albeit not a novel): the McSweeney's edition of Michael Chabon's Maps and Legends. The "dust jacket" actually constructed of three different panels, so that the multiple dimensions aren't just an illusion. It was almost the whole reason I bought the book, and I wouldn't even have been disappointed if the content had not been as brilliant as it was. As it turned out, I was just biblio-spoiled.

Pickle Me This reads Canada Reads: The Outlander by Gil Adamson

Right there on the back cover of Gil Adamson's The Outlander, it's labelled, "Part historical novel, part Gothic tale, and part literary Western". The sort of hybrid book readers go crazy for, and I've certainly never heard a word against it. Adamson's first novel (though she's published collections of short stories and poetry before) has at its forefront Mary Boulton, "The Widow", who we find at the beginning of the story fleeing through the woods with dogs on her trail, being pursued by her enormous red-headed brothers-in-law. It appears that she's killed her husband, so the brothers are determined to find her and force her to face some kind of justice.

The book refers back to a time when the maps were all empty, though we know that Mary Boulton is in Western Canada. The shape of the novel being her track across that empty place-- imagine her as a furiously dotted line. Along the way she encounters several different characters, though some are hallucinations. Never safe, she stays nowhere too long, and passes from one port to another until she ends up in the mining town of Frank, British Columbia.

The book's strongest feature is its language, I think, which is gorgeous and evocative. Describing a nature which is in turns glorious and brutal, as well as the bare facts of Mary Boulton's situation-- her hunger, her sickness, her madness. She's an intriguing character, even more so in the flashbacks when we see she comes from a background like nothing you'd expect of a murderess, and that she was a very different kind of girl once upon a time.

Unfortunately, I never felt I got close enough to her, to understand why she killed her husband, to understand why she runs. She was a character distant enough to be called just "The Widow", and those around her were even more distant, incidental to her flight. The plot seems a loose construction around the language, which dragged down to reveal that not so much was there. The book said to be "gripping" but I was never gripped. With every page, with every new character she encountered, I'd think, "Ok, now it starts..." but it never did for me.

Which I don't think is the book's fault, but I was just so far from its ideal reader. "Part historical novel, part Gothic tale, and part literary Western" seems a recipe for the kind of book that puts me to sleep. Which is why my review is a bit lax here, but there really aren't hours in the day for me to spend thoughtfully reviewing books I don't like. Particularly when so many others do like this one, and they can't all be wrong. I'll be really interested in hearing readers' arguments for this book, but I think it might all just come down to a matter of taste.

**Check out a more positive take on The Outlander over at the Canada Reads site.

Canada Reads Rankings (so far):
1) Fruit by Brian Francis
2) Mercy Among the Children by David Adams Richards
3) The Book of Negroes by Lawrence Hill
4) The Outlander by Gil Adamson

Cusp of falling headlong

I'm now reading The Outlander, which I'm not particularly loving, but I feel I may be on the cusp of falling headlong into, particularly if DGR's assessment is right. Though I do fear I may have set literary standards too high, having spent part of this weekend reading Jools Oliver's Diary of an Honest Mum. (You can read the hilariously digested version here). We shall see... Elsewhere, I loved Rona Maynard's take on the Facebook 25 things meme. To Nigel Beale for the best used book sales in Canada (and I concur, because it includes my favourite). My baby kicks like mad to this song. And there would be more, if I weren't so tired, or if lately the newspaper had been remotely interesting.

Life-changing books

Inspired by this post entitled "for the love of reading", as well as an old episode of This American Life called "The Book That Changed Your Life", I've been thinking a lot about life-changing books. Which are rarer than you think, really, considering the ratio of how many books actually get read to how often life is ever really genuinely changed. I mean, there are books that have been terribly affecting, books that have written themselves into my DNA for how much I've come to love them, or books that came my way precisely when I needed them, but I didn't necessarily start to live differently after reading them.

Top five exceptions as follows:

1) Anne of Green Gables: As I wasn't so defined before I read this book, I can't say it changed my life exactly, but I'm confident I would have a different kind of life now had I never read it. For over twenty years, I've sought to emulate Anne Shirley's ambitions, her spirit, her articulateness, her passions, her bookishness, her incorrigibility, and to see the world as she does.

2) "The Grunge Look" by Margaret Atwood: Which isn't a book, but rather as essay from Writing Away: The PEN Canada Travel Anthology. I encountered the anthology in the Hart House Library during the summer of 2002 when my life was a mess, and it was apparent to me that the only thing I could do to fix it was to run away to England like Atwood had. It was a terribly unwise decision at the time, but in retrospect was the smartest and bravest move of my life.

3) Vegetarian Classics by Jeanne Lemlin: This book taught me how to cook, as well as provided the means for us live very cheaply during the grad school/unemployment years. Our copy is now falling apart, we still use it all the time, and I hope it's not too terrible how often I just slip in a little bit of beef...

4) Animal Vegetable Miracle by Barbara Kingsolver: Last summer's garden was a bust, and Barbara would be horrified if she knew just how addicted I've become to bananas, but even still, my eating and shopping habits have been changed since I read her book almost two years ago. The vegetannual has changed the way I eat. The world tastes much better for it.

5) Taking Charge of Your Fertility by Toni Weschler. Without it I might still be waiting for a stork.

Fascinating to see how little novels factor in here, particularly because I read as many as I do. Though I wonder if novels change our lives in more subtle ways. I suspect they're the stuff we're constructed of more than the signposts along the road.

The Divided Heart: Art and Motherhood by Rachel Power

I still don't know squat about sleep training, for instance, but ever since I got pregnant, I've been obsessed with books documenting women's ambivalence towards motherhood. Anne Enright's Making Babies and Rachel Cusk's A Life's Work (in addition to the mother who lives on the other side of my garret wall and is screaming at her daughter as I write this) have served to steel my expectations for the imminent adventure ahead. Which is sort of strange because my feelings about motherhood aren't even ambivalent yet, but from the mother on the other side of the wall in particular, I've got a sense of what's coming, and I want to know how my life will change, if there's hope of retaining any of it.

It's a strange, complicated ambivalence (as opposed to, say, the childless Lionel Shriver's) that strikes women about motherhood when they actually happen to be mothers. Which is why I maintain one has to be a brilliant writer to capture it properly-- all the love that's there, even with the reservations, the powerful urge to protect still accompanying any urges to run the other way. Rachel Power's title articulating this ambivalence: The Divided Heart; "a split self; the fear that succeed at one means to fail at the other."

Power's book The Divided Heart: Art and Motherhood is a series of conversations with prominent Australian woman artists about the effect of motherhood upon their art. Part of the book's appeal in its homeland, I imagine, perhaps being insight into such notable lives, though I lack that context from where I read, as Power's subjects are unfamiliar to me. But she does such a fine job of depicting their remarkable lives-- the actresses, writers, painters, dancers among them--, as well as their back stories and very own voices that to get to know of these figures was one of the book's decided perqs.

These women's lives are remarkable, as I said, but their experiences are somewhat universal to all mothers, especially all working mothers-- that they're taken less seriously in their fields because they have children, are hindered from progressing as men (even fathers) can, their balancing "the second shift", their guilt about being absent from their children's lives. And yet there is something particular to the experience of the artist-mother, which Power well conveys. That pursuing art is often seen as an indulgence of sorts, and it doesn't bring home much financial benefit. The blurred borders between the studio and the home-front, which bring forth constant interruptions. That to give up art would be to give up a passion, part of one's heart, however divided.

The book's conversational style is delicious, shaped with Rachel Power's eye for fabulous prose, and the different perspectives enthused by her subjects make for a perfect mosaic of ideas and opinions. Which brings forth balance-- none of this is to be taken as dogma, but instead considered, weighed and evaluated. So the bad of artist-mothering-- certainly overwhelming at times-- is also countered with the good. These women's lives, however harried, still inspiring in that they get on at all. That artist-mothering is possible, even at a price.

These engaging interviews are also worthwhile for their range and detail-- for example, the various effects of pregnancy and childbirth upon the body of a ballerina, upon an opera singer's vocal range. That motherhood is not a vacuum and the rest of life creeps in as well-- Power speaks to women who've fought cancer, who are raising children with special needs, caring for elderly parents. Her artists are painters, poets, filmmakers, photographers, writers and and illustrators, and "art" is very much in general, but still such a force in all their lives. Power showing how complicated these lives are, and how various.

The value of book such as this isn't any "self-help" it offers, though I suspect it could reassure most mothers that they aren't alone. Inspiring me also with the many ways in which creative pursuits and motherhood are complementary. Which would not be the point though, the use-value hardly Power's intention, but instead the stories are an end to themselves, just like our lives are. Beautifully told, beautifully set, they deserve to be out in the world-- we're better for them-- and they really seem enough to fly by.

Reading in a Chorus

I've long been fond of the fact that I'm part of a chorus of readers, both on-line and in the actual world. The deceptively unsolitary nature of reading endlessly delights me, though I've never really been driven have us all start singing the same song. I am difficult that way. So my Canada Reads challenge is just as much an experiment, but already I'm finding positive outcomes.

On Friday night we attended the Canada Reads event at the Toronto Metro Reference Library, hosted by Matt Galloway, and featuring Gil Adamson (author of The Outlander), Patricia Hamilton (I KNOW!) speaking for The Fat Woman Next Door Is Pregnant, Brian Francis (author of Fruit), Donna Bailey-Nurse championing The Book of Negroes, and Sarah Slean speaking for Mercy Among the Children, along with its author David Adams Richards. We received the familiar joys of listening to authors read from their work, learning about their books' origins, but also the rarer joy (in public forums, at least) of readers championing beloved books. I do believe there is nothing else like it, the infection of avid readership. I came away from the event with new perspectives on the books I've already read, and I am bursting to read the final two.

At home, Canada Reads has become a family affair, and I'm enjoying that experience too. Underlining the fact that my opinions are so not subjective-- my husband has adored The Book of Negroes, for instance, and we've had so many spirited discussions about our different interpretations of the book. Our differing opinions informing each other, though never managing to change our minds, oh no. But still, that there are no wrong answers here, no clear winners or losers. Each of the books has its own reasons for emerging victorious, and those lucky among us will get a sense of every one.

(Above, Matt Galloway with the fabulous Brian Francis.)

Madeleine's Cherry Pie and Ice Cream

Today's random ramble rather conveniently veered us towards Madeleine's Cherry Pie and Ice Cream, which I've many times passed on the route to somewhere and have long been meaning to make a destination. The shop's name a literary reference (not this one, but that one), and the space is an emporium of perfect delights. A tea shop, with a back garden (come spring), and pies, and ice cream. We had scones with jam, and a pot each of rooibos, and I really must go back again for more-- cupcakes, said madeleines, brownies, where to stop? The cakery was mesmerizing, and the shop shelves bursting with wonderful things-- teapots, jam jars, cups, mugs, and the like. (And how lucky are we to live in a neighbourhood with so many corners to discover?)

Pickle Me This reads Canada Reads: Mercy Among the Children by David Adams Richards

Following along with Canada Reads online, I've found it a testament to both the book and its author that so many readers have been driven to put down Mercy Among the Children because of its "bleakness", or because "it's depressing." Doesn't that strike you as a powerful effect for a novel to have? To be abandoned for reasons quite different from being boring, or incomprehensible. Any assemblage of text that can hit one that hard must be something of an marvelous construction.

But I do understand what these readers are saying, because Mercy is certainly not easy. Though it's not difficult either, being set within the last twenty years, most excellently paced, and written in accessible language that still manages to be exquisite prose. Where I lacked access, however, was in terms of literary allusion, which restricted a whole plane of the novel's experience. Further, I'm seriously under-read in the kinds of novels from which this one finds its tradition-- nineteenth century, Russian, or written by Thomas Hardy.

I think understanding this kind of literary tradition would have provided the bleakness of Mercy Among the Children with some kind of context. But lacking that background as I do, I could only take the Richards' narrative as I found it. The story of the Henderson family whose bad luck is unrelenting, as narrated by their son Lyle. The father Sydney committing himself to pacifism at a young age to save himself from the world around him, for he believes that whatever ill you inflict upon another will come back to you in ways that are multifold. This stance distinguishing Sydney as somebody different, a threat to the status-quo.

"You are allowed anything in this life," Sydney's wife Elly tries to tell him, "except the luxury of being different-- this is why you are being tried." Theirs is a world where success comes only with "deceit and treachery", and Sydney's refusal to pay this price means his family remains impoverished out in their tar-shack on the highway, his children are tormented at school, and he is framed for crimes he would never commit. He won't defend himself against these accusations either, feeling such arguments beneath him. He may be an uneducated man, but he taught himself to read, and he has absorbed enough of the wisdom of books (which as "knowledge" is distinguished from "learning") to be confident in the direction of his leanings.

As a reader I had to steel myself against the Hendersons' fate, one horrible plight after after and soon I just became resigned (which is perhaps my version of "putting the book down"). The novel's devastating conclusion utterly ineffectual then, for I'd become numb to it all-- but as Lyle Henderson had to some extent too, I think my experience was analogous. The conclusion also somewhat satisfying in proving that Sydney Henderson was right, that everyone will get what's coming at the end, though I wonder-- at what price?

This is an interesting novel to consider for discussion, because I think most readers will focus on a judgment of the characters rather than a discussion of the book itself. Whether Sydney was right in his stance, did he betray his family, whether Lyle's deviation from his father's ways was justified or not. Though there is a certain limitation to this kind of discussion too, for so many of Richards' characters are written as "types". He explains them to us: who is weak and who is strong, and though he has sympathy for some of the most unsympathetic types (providing an understanding of the devious Pits, for instance, who are the architects of most of the Hendersons' destruction), others (particularly those who are more "learned" than "wise") are presented as utterly ignorant and one dimensional.

I struggled with the female characters too, who were beautiful, stupid and helpless (but with a core of inner strength), and endlessly coveted sexually, or were shrewd, mannish, ugly, and utterly unsexed. In the novel's afterward, more hopeful scenarios are presented for these characters (or at least for those who haven't died), but these are more alluded to rather than shown.

Mercy Among the Children read like a great novel to me, in a way that Brian Francis's Fruit isn't, but-- guess what-- I still think Fruit is more worthy of being the novel that Canada Reads. Actually dealing with much the same subject matter too-- Peter Paddington would probably be well aware that we're allowed anything in this life except the luxury of being different. Peter is feared for his differences just as Sydney Henderson is feared, because those who challenge the status-quo threaten to expose the worst about the rest of us. But because Francis doesn't drive the point all the way home in quite the way that Richards does, and because Francis's comedy is most engaging (and rare in Canadian lit.), I will leave Fruit at number one.

I still think The Book of Negroes is an amazing book, and worth reading for all of the reasons Avi Lewis outlines here. But I don't think any of his reasons are good ones for picking up a novel. I really find The Book of Negroes is a kind of nonfiction incognito, and though I enjoyed it more than Mercy Among the Children, and learned much more from it, I can't help but determine Mercy.. as a more successful work of fiction.

Canada Reads Rankings (so far):
1) Fruit by Brian Francis
2) Mercy Among the Children by David Adams Richards
3) The Book of Negroes by Lawrence Hill

Table

I can't quite figure out why I find the first part of the dictionary definition for "table" so delightful, but I really do: "table. 1. a piece of furniture with a flat top and one or more legs, providing a level surface for eating, writing, or working at, playing games on, etc..." Laid out like that, has there ever been anything more charming? Must any world with tables in it not be such a terrible place?

Those female writers

"I'm a feminist, and God knows I'm loyal to my sex, and you must remember that from my very early days, when this city was scarcely safe from buffaloes, I was in the struggle for equal rights for women. But when we paraded through the catcalls of men and when we chained ourselves to lampposts to try to get our equality-- dear child, we didn't foresee those female writers." --Dorothy Parker, The Paris Review Interviews Vol. 1

The dearth of female names

7 February 2009

Dear ***, Editor, **** Magazine

This letter is not intended for publication, and no doubt it will read as such, being neither particularly witty or erudite, or especially timely. But I do think it is fair to write to you and explain why I will not be renewing my subscription to **** after three years.

It has been nearly a year since I began counting the number of women writers amongst your contributors. Initially the dearth of female names was more peculiar than troubling. I was unsure of how a general interest/current affairs magazine could be very general or current while (very nearly) only publishing pieces written by men. But when each subsequent issue appeared, usually with less women than the one before it (and when the women did appear, it was rarely for any feature of significant length), I began to be disturbed.

Either you're not interested in commissioning women writers, or you haven't noticed the imbalance in your issues, and I'm really not sure which of these possibilities is the worst.

Do know that I'm not counting for counting's sake. I am not convinced that there is such a thing as "women's writing", but I am sure that the lack of women's voices in your pages has made your magazine less interesting. I used to make a point of reading every issue in its entirety, regardless of my interest, because the writing was good, and there was always something for me to learn. But lately this has felt like a chore, and I don't feel I get the payoff.

Please take a look at even your cover designs over the past year, take a look at your features. I am sure the lack of diversity amongst your contributors is the reason **** has come to resemble a Men's Magazine proper. And I know this is the reason that I, as a female subscriber, no longer feel like it's a magazine for me. I must not be the only one.

Thank you for your time,

Kerry Clare

Reading in Pickle Colour

Today I finally picked up a copy of the marvelous I Can Read With My Eyes Shut, which might be the closest thing to a holy book those in my religion have-- in rhyme no less. ("The more that you read,/ the more you will know./ The more that you learn,/ the more places you'll go.") And I like to think the first page (shown here) was a reference to Pickle Me This. I got the book at Circus Books and Music, which is a wonderful store with exceptional children's books. We were out on the Danforth after a spectacular brunch at The Only Cafe, and then walked westward. At the Danforth Type Books, I bought I Kissed the Baby, but not for me, that one. (Oh no, it's for the baby's library.) Outside, we're enjoying this crazy February Sunday Sun again and it's wonderful.

Tomorrow on the radio

I heard on the radio this morning that Shelagh Rogers's The Next Chapter tomorrow will be celebrating Carol Shields on the occasion of the 15th anniversary of The Stone Diaries. CBC Radio 1 at 3:00pm. I will be listening.

Babies and reading

A few weeks back I was happy to discover that Kate Christensen has a new novel coming out in early June. I'll be reading it, naturally, though when, I cannot say. If I do happen to be 41 weeks pregnant in early June, then perhaps a good book will be welcome company, though it's just as likely I'll be a brand new mother with just a week's experience, so I probably won't be reading much of anything.

There are mothers who read, of course-- mothers of babies and mothers of toddlers. I know this mostly because I read their blogs, and these mothers provide me with a great deal of reassurance. That having my baby won't require handing my brain in (or if it does, at least I get it back in a little while). I've been planning my summer rereading project already, as I always do, and it's mainly consisting of easy, well-loved novels that won't require a great deal of concentration-- I'm thinking Good in Bed, Saturday, Happy All the Time, and, if I'm feeling brave, A Novel About My Wife. It would be nice to read maybe one a week? (At the moment I read about three, but then I also work full time.)

I was going to cancel my subscription to The London Review of Books, but I've since decided otherwise. I hope motherhood won't be an excuse to just give up being challenged, and I certainly won't have to read the whole of every issue. But the articles that interest me are just so interesting, and I learn so much from them. I will be cutting down on the number of periodicals that come into our house though, which probably would be a good idea anyway.

Anyone who has ever had a baby is probably by now hysterical with laughter at my naivete, but let me tell you that whenever I'm told something isn't possible, I tend to get it done. My mother says that babies sleep a lot. If I remember correctly, Alice Munro has said something much the same, so I believe it. I am also determined to master nursing and reading, which can't be impossible as I've already taught myself to floss and read, and knit and read, so this is just another challenge. But I will try to keep an open mind and my expectations only moderately high.

If by the end of the summer, I've read Kate Christensen's new novel at all, I'll consider myself not too far off track.

Good Egg

We maintain a list at our house of small businesses unlikely to weather the economic downturn well. Already, the pillow shop on Queen Street has gone out of business, and I don't have high hopes for organic dog bakeries and fromageries. Though that our local tea boutique is flourishing means that Good Egg might stand a chance. At least, I really, really hope it does, because I liked the place a lot.

Another bookstore in Kensingston Market, and that this one specializes in cookbooks is only half the story. They've got display tables crowded with kitchen stuff, all your heart so desires but doesn't especially need, which does nothing to negate that desire-- perhaps I should have that ninth teapot. And though usually I'd think twice about any store that sells books and gifts together, Good Egg has selected their books with such obvious care that I really can't help but forgive them.

The books take up about half the store, and aren't just cookbooks, but food books, and all varieties of food books. Their children's section is lovely, stocked with food-themed books for babies and up (I spotted Green Eggs and Ham, The Carrot Seed, The Giving Tree, though there were plenty more), as well as non-food books that are just delicious. Similarly are non-food books for adults stuck in amongst the other shelves, though I got the feeling that if I thought about them hard enough, I could discern how they might fit in with motif. Fiction fascinatingly scattered in the manner of a treasure trove around cookbooks from all over the world, food essays, chef bios, books on agriculture, and the Omnivore's Dilemma. Every shelf yielding a surprise-- an etiquette section, India Knight's new book on thrift, a book on the art of letter writing, as well as numerous crafty delights.

The whole effect sounds a bit kitschy, but there was substance to it. (Oh, and aren't Tessa Kiros' cookbooks the most beautiful in the world?) Every single book in Good Egg had been selected so deliberately, arranged so artfully, and the entire place was a delight to explore just like every good bookstore should be.

A delight to live inside

I've got a lot to say, but Monday evenings deliver only the briefest window between pre-natal yoga and Midsomer Murders, and so alas. Let it be known that I'm now reading Revolutionary Road, which was a Zmas gift from my friend Bronwyn, and that I spoiled the ending today through wikipedian ramblings, which I'm a bit annoyed about, but I'm still enjoying the read. And that because the last couple of weeks (and more?) have been wrought with anxiety, tension and stress, this weekend was such a delight to live inside. I've been volunteering at the Children's Book Bank since New Year, and have found it's more than a pleasure to read stories one after another to eager children who then just want one more. On Saturday night, we hosted a small birthday gathering for the one-of-a-kind e. smith, with a special appearance from our beloved Sk8 who's been in South America for the past two years. And there were cupcakes, oh yes. Then Sunday morning in Kensington, where cheese curds were had and sunshine was soaked and we held hands without mittens, and ice was melting everywhere. A glimpse of spring, which was the best thing. I arrived home with thousands of things to do, but decided to spend the afternoon asleep in my slanket instead. We had dearest friends over for a roast chicken dinner, and it was delicious, company was lovely. And best of all, that our baby is a kickboxer (sport of the future). The flutters have turned to thumps, and I think they just might be the more amazing sensation I've ever experienced. I could get kicked and kicked all day.

The latest postal haul

I arrived home today to a mailbox overflowing with literary goodness. The latest issue of The New Quarterly, a brand new Canadian Notes and Queries, as well as The Divided Heart: Art and Motherhood by Rachel Power, which should still have been en-route from Australia by sea, but I suspect someone put it on an airplane by mistake-- what a treat.

Pickle Me This reads Canada Reads: Fruit by Brian Francis

In Brian Francis's not-yet-coming-of -age story Fruit, Peter Paddington is the hero of his own life. So successfully entrenched within his own perspective, he's in the league of famed adolescent narrators Huck and Holden, though stylistically is most akin to the great Adrian Mole. Francis casts a spell with Peter's voice, and not once does the spell ever break.

I want to protest only about how this book was sold to me, even in its quirky subtitle, "a novel about a boy and his nipples". The first line of the blurb on the back of the book is, "Peter Paddington is a 13-year-old, fat, gay cross-dresser...", which really didn't immediately capture my attention, so as I read the book I was relieved to come to see that Peter Paddington is actually quite normal. Or perfectly normal from the point of view of anyone who spent a pretty tortured few (or more) years growing into themselves. Any of us who've ever had to work in the school library at recess in lieu of having friends, or who'd read that conditioning one's hair with Hellman's was a good idea, only to wind up with a scalp like a grease pit.

Peter Paddington may very well grow up to be a fat, gay cross-dresser, which is all fine and well, but the point is that his adolescent experience is pretty universal. Pretty awful too-- he's bullied at school, he's longing for friends, he's embarrassed about his body in general, and puberty is hardly doing him any favours. Where the book gets its humour is in the gap between Peter's reality and his perception of it-- a space so rich and brilliant, allowing the reader ample room between the lines to consider this young boy's situation from an adult point of view. That Peter does not entirely understand his situation is his saving grace, though of course the book does suggest he is more aware than he lets on, but is working to actively avoid enlightenment.

It is this edge then than allows us to take Peter Paddington a little more seriously than we did the similarly hilarious Adrian Mole. Peter is not a caricature, and neither are the people around him-- particularly his loving parents who try to do their best, but are just as helpless to help him as he is. The world around him as realistically rendered-- Sarnia, Ontario in 1984, with all the pop-cultural touchstones that ring so familiar, and junior high school clique taxonomy.

But Peter's voice is Francis's greatest triumph. Peter taking himself so utterly seriously, prioritizing his own point of view in the way that real people do, and it is obvious that Francis gives Peter much the same consideration. Never breaking away from Peter's vision to insert a bit of irony, to provide a wider perspective, to ensure readers know he's writing something more than a YA novel FYI, and in never breaking away, Francis thus has created a voice that's so extraordinary. Peter Paddington is a train wreck waiting to happen, and of course we can see that because we're years older than he is and we know how the world works, but he really hasn't figured it out yet. This gap being from where the novel gets its humour, but also from where it earns its most unsentimental poignancy.

And so here's the part where, for Canada Reads sake, I argue that Francis's Fruit is superior to Lawrence Hill's The Book of Negroes. Which is the strange thing about this whole set-up, apples to oranges and all. I will definitely say that Hill's book might be more important than Francis's, that The Book of Negroes is more educational, that it will broaden our perspective in a way that Fruit only takes us inward. But Fruit is a better piece of literature, more successful in its realization. With a scope far more limited, admittedly, but I felt Hill's too-broad scope was actually his greatest limitation. Whereas everything Fruit sets out to do, it succeeds at absolutely.

Canada Reads Rankings (so far):
1) Fruit by Brian Francis
2) The Book of Negroes by Lawrence Hill